 |
|
 |
| Print Version |
|
Please use the menu on the left to navigate
through this resource
Frequently
asked questions
- Which country owes
most money? Surprisingly it isn’t one of the poor
countries. It is in fact the USA. However, because the USA earns
lots of money, the debts are not a problem for them. (Imagine you
had a really well paid job; you might borrow money to buy a house
or a car. You would be in debt, but it wouldn’t matter
because with your income you could afford to pay your debts and
still have money left over for food, entertainment and anything
else you wanted. You would be like the USA. Suppose you lost your
job however; you would no longer be able to pay your debts and your
bills. You would be like the world’s poor
countries.)
- What would happen
if the rich countries and the IMF simply cancelled the debts owed
directly to the United Kingdom? Although the total amounts of
money may seem huge to you and me, and to the poor countries, they
are in fact very small if you compare them to the wealth of the
rich countries. The debts of Sub-Saharan Africa amount to just 1%
of world trade. It has been estimated that to pay off all the debts
that the 41 poorest countries owe to Britain would cost each person
in Britain just £2.00.
- How can we know
that if the debts are cancelled poor people will benefit? It is
possible for the rich countries to insist that if debt is cancelled
that the money will be spent on things like health and education,
and not on weapons or luxuries for the country's leaders. It is
possible to set up monitoring schemes to check that the spending is
going to the poor.
- Surely it is
morally correct that people should have to pay their debts?
That's a good point, but many of the indebted countries have in
fact paid back what they originally borrowed and a lot more - it is
the interest that has been added to the loan that they are
struggling to pay. Some of the money was stolen by corrupt
politicians who are no longer in power - is it fair that the poor
people of these countries should now be forced to pay back money
they never benefited from? Which is the greater moral wrong,
failure to pay debts or people dying from poverty?
- If the debts were
cancelled this time, what's to stop the poor countries borrowing
more money and getting in debt again? At the moment nothing!
Campaigners say that it is important not only to cancel the debts
but for the rich and poor countries to get together and come up
with ways to better organise the global financial system. It is
important to find ways in which poor countries can work their way
out of poverty, with help from the rich countries if necessary,
without getting into unsustainable debt again.
|
|